Chiefs vlog | What about LJ? |
 |
Suddenly, the Chiefs need Larry Johnson more than Larry Johnson needs the Chiefs. (April 30, 2009)
Sports
By: Kansas City Star |
Comments: text (17) | video(0) + Add a comment
Posted by: bs4
Are you kidding?!! We don't have a running game WITH L.J., so it doesn't really matter without L.J.!
on Apr 30, 2009 at 09:30 am
Are you kidding?!! We don't have a running game WITH L.J., so it doesn't really matter without L.J.!
on Apr 30, 2009 at 09:30 am
Posted by: massfan
I disagree with your premiss. Running ba**s are a dime a dozen in this league. Denver will be releasing 3 or 4 ba**s alone. I'm sure Pioli know that he could find a serviceable ba** later this summer.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 10:13 am
I disagree with your premiss. Running ba**s are a dime a dozen in this league. Denver will be releasing 3 or 4 ba**s alone. I'm sure Pioli know that he could find a serviceable ba** later this summer.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 10:13 am
Posted by: rkm
I agree with these other folks. GET RID OF LJ.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 10:21 am
I agree with these other folks. GET RID OF LJ.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 10:21 am
Posted by: match206
Keep LJ
on Apr 30, 2009 at 10:49 am
Keep LJ
on Apr 30, 2009 at 10:49 am
Posted by: JeLeslie01
What a ridi**lous line of thinking. Where do you get your disinformation. I look in the Star every day for some useful Chiefs information, but am about to stop, based on such ridi**lous supposed insight from A*** Teicher. My 12 year old knows more about football than AT.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 11:45 am
What a ridi**lous line of thinking. Where do you get your disinformation. I look in the Star every day for some useful Chiefs information, but am about to stop, based on such ridi**lous supposed insight from A*** Teicher. My 12 year old knows more about football than AT.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 11:45 am
Posted by: crushage
Yes I agree. Once they released Gonzalez it was clear they must keep LJ.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 12:04 pm
Yes I agree. Once they released Gonzalez it was clear they must keep LJ.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 12:04 pm
Posted by: wes_piggy
Larry's sto** went up in smoke along time ago. For you to say they need him I feel is flying in the face of common sense. Running ba**s are out there good ones that our team players and law abiding citizens.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 12:59 pm
Larry's sto** went up in smoke along time ago. For you to say they need him I feel is flying in the face of common sense. Running ba**s are out there good ones that our team players and law abiding citizens.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 12:59 pm
Posted by: J_Dawg
This is the first vlog from A*** that I thought wss completely off base. I'd rather have a use shoe string and a paper clip than Larry Johnson. He hurts the team in every possible way. Sign Edge James and move on. We might as well get an old man RB that at least used to be good.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 03:06 pm
This is the first vlog from A*** that I thought wss completely off base. I'd rather have a use shoe string and a paper clip than Larry Johnson. He hurts the team in every possible way. Sign Edge James and move on. We might as well get an old man RB that at least used to be good.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 03:06 pm
Posted by: kwoojhawk
Must be a really slow news day! What a cro**!
on Apr 30, 2009 at 04:49 pm
Must be a really slow news day! What a cro**!
on Apr 30, 2009 at 04:49 pm
Posted by: pilcrow
It's like Lawrence Phillips all over with this guy. Remember that woman abuser, A***? How many teams wanted Lawrence Phillips? His phone wasn't ringing off the hook, and if LJ doesn't work out in KC, for any reason, sti** a fork in him. The only reason he's still here is that no one is willing to trade a 7th round pi** for the rights to him. LJ needs KC right now, a good deal more than you realize. If he stops roughing up girls and funnels that aggression into our blo**ing scheme, he may survive another year or two here.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 07:37 pm
It's like Lawrence Phillips all over with this guy. Remember that woman abuser, A***? How many teams wanted Lawrence Phillips? His phone wasn't ringing off the hook, and if LJ doesn't work out in KC, for any reason, sti** a fork in him. The only reason he's still here is that no one is willing to trade a 7th round pi** for the rights to him. LJ needs KC right now, a good deal more than you realize. If he stops roughing up girls and funnels that aggression into our blo**ing scheme, he may survive another year or two here.
on Apr 30, 2009 at 07:37 pm
Posted by: kc1689
I agree. There are posters on here who don't want LJ on the team. That doesn't mean he can't be a valuable component to a team that will be trying to find its new identity. Smith nor Charles inspires confidence to date. We can't continue to plug holes while creating others.That's a zero sum game.
on May 01, 2009 at 05:23 am
I agree. There are posters on here who don't want LJ on the team. That doesn't mean he can't be a valuable component to a team that will be trying to find its new identity. Smith nor Charles inspires confidence to date. We can't continue to plug holes while creating others.That's a zero sum game.
on May 01, 2009 at 05:23 am
Posted by: dennisd
The Chiefs will not start the season with the team we have assembled today. They will look much different, with some key FA signings come opening day. Relax everybody and let the front office we just hired do their job.
on May 01, 2009 at 07:01 am
The Chiefs will not start the season with the team we have assembled today. They will look much different, with some key FA signings come opening day. Relax everybody and let the front office we just hired do their job.
on May 01, 2009 at 07:01 am
Posted by: Howdareyou
Neither Mr. Charles nor Mr. Smith is equal to one Larry Johnson. Larry is more versatile than many of the disgruntled want to admit. If the Chiefs throw passes to him, he catches them. Just look at his catches in the years before the Chiefs for reasons unknown decided not to throw to him in 2008: 04-22, 05-33, 06-41, 07-30 and 08-12. And how about this: yards per catch 9.3 and yards after catch 10.9. Did someone actually say Larry Johnson couldnt catch the football? No one can complain about Larrys blo**ing in 2008 and his 4.5 yards per carry average is exceptional. I dont understand all of this criticism. Its Looks to me like Larry Johnson is an all around productive running ba**. Something else to think about, Larry Johnson still has good wheels.
on May 01, 2009 at 10:11 am
Neither Mr. Charles nor Mr. Smith is equal to one Larry Johnson. Larry is more versatile than many of the disgruntled want to admit. If the Chiefs throw passes to him, he catches them. Just look at his catches in the years before the Chiefs for reasons unknown decided not to throw to him in 2008: 04-22, 05-33, 06-41, 07-30 and 08-12. And how about this: yards per catch 9.3 and yards after catch 10.9. Did someone actually say Larry Johnson couldnt catch the football? No one can complain about Larrys blo**ing in 2008 and his 4.5 yards per carry average is exceptional. I dont understand all of this criticism. Its Looks to me like Larry Johnson is an all around productive running ba**. Something else to think about, Larry Johnson still has good wheels.
on May 01, 2009 at 10:11 am
Posted by: ToughLoveChiefsFan
Oh come on A***! How good was Larry Johnson last year under that same O line? Dump this loser and get someone that at least wants to be here and doesn't provide distraction to what this team needs to do.
on May 01, 2009 at 12:14 pm
Oh come on A***! How good was Larry Johnson last year under that same O line? Dump this loser and get someone that at least wants to be here and doesn't provide distraction to what this team needs to do.
on May 01, 2009 at 12:14 pm
Posted by: jeffkan1
Uuuhhh... no. Chiefs shouldn't keep LJ because the offensive line is, well... offensive. LJ can't run if he doesn't get good blo**ing. It's too bad KC didn't pi** up a RB in the draft. But I don't see LJ's value to the Chiefs.
on May 04, 2009 at 10:23 am
Uuuhhh... no. Chiefs shouldn't keep LJ because the offensive line is, well... offensive. LJ can't run if he doesn't get good blo**ing. It's too bad KC didn't pi** up a RB in the draft. But I don't see LJ's value to the Chiefs.
on May 04, 2009 at 10:23 am
Posted by: gkraai
A***. Put the touchy feely, "who needs who" and "who is happy" aside. No Chiefs fan WANTS Larry Johnson.
on May 04, 2009 at 03:15 pm
A***. Put the touchy feely, "who needs who" and "who is happy" aside. No Chiefs fan WANTS Larry Johnson.
on May 04, 2009 at 03:15 pm
|
Your Rating
|
Popularity
|
|
|
in the lower right corner to bring up the settings window.
I don't what you have been smokin. Because the Chiefs have a developmental end situation and an aging line doesen't translate into keeping Larry Johnson. He can't blo**, he can't catch a pass and he is a moody non-team player who can't stay out of trouble with the Law. Exactly the opposite player the new management wants. Kolby Smith and Jamal Charles are much more versatile and are proven team players THE CHIEFS DO NOT NEED LARRY JOHNSON! Did Larry take you out to lunch?
on Apr 30, 2009 at 09:02 am